Home / Comparisons / ServPrivacy vs Incognet

Honest Comparison

ServPrivacy vs Incognet

A transparent, feature-by-feature comparison. Both hosts serve the privacy-oriented market, but they optimise for different things. Here is how they stack up on no-KYC, crypto support, jurisdictional coverage and hardware.

ServPrivacy 7 Jurisdictions · 2025

Incognet Netherlands / Luxembourg · 2021

ServPrivacy wins

4/15

Incognet wins

2/15

Feature by feature

Complete Comparison

Every attribute is verified from public documentation at the time of writing. We will update this page if either side changes its policy.

Feature	ServPrivacy	Incognet
No email required
Token-based authentication
Jurisdictions	7	2
DMCA-ignored policy
Full KVM virtualization
Bare-metal servers
Custom ISO upload
DDoS protection included
Unmetered bandwidth
IPv6 /64 included
99.9% SLA with credits		—
Monero (XMR) payment
Years in operation	1	4
Entry VPS specs	2 vCPU · 4 GB DDR4 · 60 GB NVMe	1 vCPU · 1 GB · 25 GB NVMe
Dedicated starting at	$99/mo	€89/mo

Fair analysis

Strengths on both sides

Where ServPrivacy wins

7 jurisdictions vs their 2
Zero email / zero personal info
SLA credits

Where Incognet is strong

True DMCA-ignored in Luxembourg and Netherlands
Monero accepted
Good technical team

Our honest verdict

Incognet does the DMCA-ignored thing well in 2 jurisdictions. ServPrivacy does it in 7, with no email, and adds SLA credits. Incognet is ahead on Monero payment.

Pick ServPrivacy if

Choose ServPrivacy if: you want more jurisdiction diversity, you want no-email signup, or you need SLA credits.

Pick Incognet if

Choose Incognet if: Monero is a hard requirement (ServPrivacy currently only supports BTC/ETH/SOL/USDT), or you like their specific infrastructure choices.

Keep comparing